IIPLA Newsroom Access

Sign in with Google to continue in IP News.

Google SSO gives you the quickest path into the IIPLA newsroom, your reading access, and member-level continuity across articles. The full login page is still available if you prefer another option.

IIPLA News
Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Deal reached in US legal dispute over Firdapse generic for LEMS

Catalyst Pharmaceuticals and Lupin have settled a legal dispute related to Lupin’s generic version of Firdapse (amifampridine) — an approved brand-na…

IIPLA News Deskanonymous access0 articles left this week
Deal reached in US legal dispute over Firdapse generic for LEMS

Catalyst Pharmaceuticals and Lupin have settled a legal dispute related to Lupin’s generic version of Firdapse (amifampridine) — an approved brand-name treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS).

Under the terms of the new deal, Lupin will not market its generic therapy in the U.S. prior to Feb. 25, 2035. That’s according to a press release from Catalyst, which holds the marketing rights to Firdapse in the U.S.

The dispute between the two companies arose when Lupin asked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve its generic version of Firdapse. The brand-name medication has been approved in the U.S. since 2018, and is now indicated for the treatment of LEMS patients ages 6 and older.

Catalyst sued its competitor, alleging that Lupin’s generic would infringe on its patent protections for Firdapse.

The FDA granted the generic tentative approval earlier this year, but the medication could not be brought to market until the patent litigation was resolved. Now, Catalyst and Lupin have struck an accord that terminates that litigation battle in U.S. District Court.

This isn’t the first time that Catalyst has gone to court to defend its intellectual property rights to Firdapse. The company previously struck similar deals with Teva Pharmaceuticals and Inventia Healthcare Limited — both of which were also looking to market generic versions of the therapy. A patent litigation over Firdapse’s intellectual rights with Hetero is ongoing.

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom
PatentsUSA

BakerHostetler Report Highlights AI’s Disruptive Impact on US IP Strategies

A recent report from BakerHostetler underscores the urgent need for US businesses to overhaul their intellectual property strategies in response to the transformative effects of artificial intelligence, evolving social media practices, and significant regulatory changes. The firm’s 2026 IP Perspectives report details…

Thursday, April 30, 2026
LitigationChina

Review of China’s IP protection landscape from 2022–24: part two

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND Charles Feng of Tahota Law Firm concludes a two-part series on intellectual property protection in China by looking at copyright, unfair competition, and a change to the appeals procedure for technology-related disputes

Thursday, April 30, 2026
PatentsUSA

Moderna to Pay Up to $2.25B to Settle COVID-19 Vaccine Patent Lawsuit

Biotechnology company Moderna has agreed to pay up to $2.25 billion to settle patent litigation over technology used in its COVID-19 vaccine, resolving a dispute with Arbutus Biopharma and Genevant Sciences. The lawsuits alleged that Moderna’s vaccine relied on patented lipid nanoparticle delivery systems, a technolog…

Wednesday, April 29, 2026
PatentsUSA

Supreme Court Issues Key Rulings and Hears New Cases on Intellectual Property in 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court concluded its 2023-24 term with significant decisions impacting intellectual property law, including a unanimous ruling on the Lanham Act’s name clause and a split decision on the timing of copyright damages. As the 2024-25 term begins, the Court has agreed to hear additional IP cases while decl…

Wednesday, April 29, 2026
PatentsUSA

Federal Circuit Confirms Generic Drugmakers Can Deduct Hatch-Waxman Litigation Costs

In a landmark decision, the Federal Circuit has ruled that generic pharmaceutical companies may deduct legal expenses incurred in defending Hatch-Waxman patent litigation as ordinary and necessary business expenses. The ruling, which affirms a lower court's decision in favor of Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., clarifies…

Wednesday, April 29, 2026