The Delhi High Court IP Division’s first year has transformed Indian IP jurisprudence

The Delhi High Court is considered to be a leading venue for resolving IP rights disputes in India. This position was cemented after the abolition of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in April 2021, after which the IP Division was announced in July 2021 and became functional on 28 February 2022 once the division’s 2022 Rules and the High Court of Delhi Rules Governing Patent Suits 2022 had been notified. Currently, the IP division has three benches with one IP Appellate Division with all IP matters under its purview, including:

A notable feature of the IP division is that while it is a specialised IP court, it is not staffed solely by IP expert judges, but also by judges from varying practice areas. In addition, the rules are a great example of streamlining procedures to complement the commercial courts’ existing efficiencies. Commercial courts were set up in 2015; all IP suits are referred to as ‘commercial suits’, which are subject to strict timelines and procedures in order to shorten litigation. There are fixed deadlines for the completion of pleadings, while case management procedures allow judges to supervise, control and monitor the speed of litigation, summary judgments can be passed against parties if they have no prospect of winning at trial and appeals to a bigger bench of the court against interim orders are largely reduced. Changes in the Delhi High Court's working rules in 2018 and 2020 have also enabled electronic means of service, recording evidence through videoconferencing and the establishment of confidentiality clubs as a means of exchanging confidential information between parties.

If a trademark or patent is involved in multiple suits, the court can consolidate the proceedings towards a common trial. Consolidation, without causing prejudice to either party’s rights, saves judicial time and costs for litigants.

The court can also seek assistance from independent experts; persuasive and technically competent opinions enable well-reasoned judgments and also address nuanced questions in IP rights disputes.

The supervisory jurisdiction granted to division benches over IP offices has allowed the division to pass orders that enhance the overall functioning of Indian IP offices and to hear appeals that arise from IP office decisions.

It is worth mentioning that the division rules also contain special provisions for individuals with disabilities.