IIPLA News
Friday, October 6, 2023

Harvard Law Expert Details Disney’s Role in Shaping U.S. Copyright Law to Safeguard Iconic Characters

Professor Rebecca Tushnet discusses Disney’s influence on copyright extensions and the complexities of public domain use for characters like Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh

IIPLA News Deskanonymous access0 articles left this week
Harvard Law Expert Details Disney’s Role in Shaping U.S. Copyright Law to Safeguard Iconic Characters

October 16, 2023, marks 100 years since Walt and Roy Disney founded Disney Brothers Studio, an animation company that evolved into a global entertainment powerhouse valued at $145 billion. Over the past century, Disney has produced beloved characters such as Mickey Mouse, Winnie the Pooh, Piglet, and Christopher Robin, captivating audiences worldwide.

Beyond its creative achievements, Disney has been a formidable defender of its intellectual property rights. The company has pursued numerous lawsuits against alleged copyright and trademark infringements, including a notable 1989 incident where it threatened legal action against three Florida daycare centers for murals featuring Disney characters.

Disney’s influence extends beyond litigation; it has actively lobbied for federal legislation to prolong copyright protections. The 1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, often dubbed the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act," lengthened copyright terms for new works and extended renewal periods for pre-1978 publications, reflecting Disney’s vested interest in safeguarding its intellectual property.

Despite these protections, some early Disney characters, including Steamboat Willie (an early Mickey Mouse iteration) and A.A. Milne’s Winnie-the-Pooh, have entered or are nearing entry into the public domain. This transition has enabled new creators to utilize these characters, sometimes in controversial ways.

Rebecca Tushnet, the Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment at Harvard Law School, spoke with Harvard Law Today about Disney’s century-long impact on U.S. copyright law and the legal considerations for creators working with public domain characters.

When asked about Disney’s influence on copyright law, Tushnet noted that Disney often operates through trade organizations rather than direct advocacy. She explained that large content owners tend to garner more sympathy when advocating for extended copyrights on behalf of individual artists.

Regarding Disney’s adaptations of classic fairy tales such as Cinderella and The Little Mermaid, Tushnet clarified that Disney owns the copyright only in its unique expression of these stories — including specific visuals and non-traditional plot elements. Other creators remain free to produce their own versions, provided they avoid Disney’s distinctive artistic contributions.

Addressing the public domain status of characters like Winnie the Pooh and Steamboat Willie, Tushnet emphasized that anyone can reproduce these works or create derivative works using only the public domain elements. She cited the example of a Winnie the Pooh horror movie that carefully avoided visuals still protected by copyright, as some Pooh books were published later and remain under protection.

Tushnet highlighted the complexity introduced by trademark law, which continues to protect characters even after copyright expiration, provided Disney maintains the necessary filings. This protection can limit how others use public domain characters, particularly in commercial contexts.

She observed that while Disney might not legally prevail in lawsuits against uses of public domain images on merchandise like lunchboxes, the company is likely to mount vigorous legal defenses. The Supreme Court’s decision in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. affirmed that once copyright expires, others may use the work without attribution, as long as they do not misrepresent the source. However, the practical application of this ruling remains unsettled due to the rarity of works entering the public domain in recent decades.

Tushnet concluded that the contours of public domain use and trademark enforcement are still evolving, especially as more iconic characters transition out of copyright protection. Creators interested in leveraging these characters must proceed cautiously to navigate the overlapping legal protections.

As Disney commemorates its 100th anniversary, the interplay between copyright law, trademark rights, and creative expression continues to shape the legacy and future use of its most cherished characters.

Share This Article
Ready-to-post copy includes the article link.

Harvard Law Expert Details Disney’s Role in Shaping U.S. Copyright Law to Safeguard Iconic Characters As Disney celebrates its centennial, Harvard Law’s Rebecca Tushnet explains how the company’s lobbying efforts have extended copyright protections for its characters. She also highlights the legal nuances creators face... Read the full IIPLA article: https://iipla.org/news/harvard-law-expert-details-disney-s-role-in-shaping-u-s-copyright-law-to-safeguard-iconic-characters

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom
Litigationaustralia

Gladstone Police Charge Two Maryborough Residents with 34 Property Offences

Detectives from the Gladstone Property Crime Unit have charged a 30-year-old woman and a 40-year-old man, both from Maryborough, with a total of 34 offences related to recent property crimes in the Gladstone region. The woman was apprehended after attempting to evade police and enter moving vehicles, while the man was…

Friday, July 3, 2026
TrademarksGlobal

Swatch Initiates $170 Million Trademark Lawsuit Against Samsung Over Smartwatch Design

Swiss luxury watchmaker Swatch has filed a significant trademark infringement lawsuit against Samsung, pursuing $170 million in damages. The case raises complex issues regarding consumer perception and the valuation of brand licensing in the luxury goods sector. Legal experts highlight the unique challenges and potent…

Thursday, July 2, 2026