IIPLA News
Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Munich UPC Division Clarifies Claim Interpretation for Medical Devices in Emboline v. AorticLab Dispute

Court finds no infringement of Emboline’s embolic protection device patent, emphasizing the significance of normal professional use in medical device claims.

IIPLA News Deskanonymous access0 articles left this week
UPC Claim Interpretation: The Normal Use Of A Medical Device Matters
Sign In To Continue

You have reached the guest article limit.

Unlock more of the IIPLA newsroom by signing in with SSO or joining as a member.

The Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court has ruled in favor of AorticLab srl, finding no infringement of Emboline Inc.'s patent for an embolic protection device. The decision underscores the importance of interpreting claim features in light of normal professional use, particularly for medical devices. Th…
Share This Article
Ready-to-post copy includes the article link.

Munich UPC Division Clarifies Claim Interpretation for Medical Devices in Emboline v. AorticLab Dispute The Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court has ruled in favor of AorticLab srl, finding no infringement of Emboline Inc.'s patent for an embolic protection device. The decision underscores the importance of i... Read the full IIPLA article: https://iipla.org/news/munich-upc-division-clarifies-claim-interpretation-for-medical-devices-in-emboline-v-aorticlab-dispute

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom