Ramey IP Attorneys and Client Ordered to Pay $107K in Attorney Fees for Bad-Faith Suit

Monday, March 23, 2026iiplaeditorialSource: IIPLA
ramey-ip-attorneys-and-client-ordered-to.png
Source attribution
Image: Image courtesy of iipla.org

Ramey IP Attorneys and Client Ordered to Pay $107K in Attorney Fees for Bad-Faith Suit

By Editorial Team

A San Francisco federal judge has ruled that three sanctioned attorneys, including Texas intellectual property lawyer William Ramey III, along with their client, must pay $107,389 in attorney fees related to three identical patent suits that were initiated and subsequently withdrawn in 2024. The judge has also directed Ramey to provide reasons why he should not face additional sanctions.

The case involved a bad-faith lawsuit that resulted in the attorneys and their client being held responsible for the incurred legal fees. The judge's decision underscores the importance of ethical conduct in legal proceedings and serves as a warning against frivolous litigation.

Law360 provides comprehensive coverage of legal developments and trends, offering in-depth analysis and insights into significant cases and issues that impact the legal industry. Subscribers gain access to a wealth of resources, including daily newsletters, expert commentary, real-time alerts, and a vast archive of articles across various practice areas and jurisdictions.

For more information and to stay informed on the latest legal news, subscribe to Law360 and start your free 7-day trial today.

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom
IP News

Purple Rain Co-Star Ends Apollonia Trademark Rights Suit

‘Purple Rain’ Co-Star Ends ‘Apollonia’ Trademark Rights Suit By Editorial Team Patty Apollonia Kotero, known for her role as Prince’s co-star in the iconic 1984 film “Purple Rain,” has decided to drop her lawsuit agai...

Thursday, April 9, 2026
IP News

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct By Editorial Team A Houston-based patent attorney faced a tough Federal Circuit bench while seeking to wipe out a $207,000 sanction against him and his clie...

Thursday, April 9, 2026
IP News

J&J Defends Blood-Clotting Powder IP From Baxter Attack

J&J Defends Blood-Clotting Powder IP From Baxter Attack By Editorial Team A subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson has successfully defended its patent for a hemostatic powder used to treat bleeding against objections from B...

Thursday, April 9, 2026