China’s Top Court Highlights IP Protection in Landmark Rulings for Private Enterprises

The SPC’s latest guiding cases aim to provide lower courts across China with authoritative examples of how to resolve complex legal disputes. While China does not operate on a strict precedent system like in common law jurisdictions, guiding cases are legally influential and widely followed by judges as reference points in future similar matters.

The two IP-related guiding cases carry deep implications for private businesses, particularly those in technology, research, and internet sectors.

---

Case One: Patent Ownership Dispute in Biotech Innovation

The first IP case involves a dispute over patent ownership between two private biotech firms. Both companies had been collaborating with a returning overseas researcher on mRNA-based osteoarthritis drug formulations. The core issue centered around the rights to the jointly developed patent and contributions made by each party.

In this case, the SPC opted for mediation over protracted litigation, facilitating a settlement that respected the innovation contributions of all parties. The resolution highlighted the court’s support for scientific research, technological advancement, and cooperative dispute resolution, particularly when it comes to complex, cutting-edge IP in the private biotech sector.

The court emphasized that private enterprises conducting independent R&D must be encouraged and safeguarded under the law, and disputes involving high-tech innovation require nuanced, balanced resolutions that maintain innovation incentives while upholding IP rights.

---

Case Two: Trademark Invalidation and Domain Name Protection

The second case examined a trademark invalidation request involving the term "DataFocus," where a newly registered trademark was seen as unfairly infringing on a prior-used domain name and trade name with substantial market reputation.

The SPC ruled in favor of the domain name holder, affirming that a domain name—when widely recognized by the public and consistently used in commerce—constitutes a protected civil right under Chinese law. As such, the subsequent trademark registration was invalidated for violating prior existing rights and misleading consumers.

This case signals an important development in how non-traditional IP assets like domain names and unregistered trade names can be protected under China's legal regime, especially when tied to longstanding commercial use and public recognition.

---