Miley Cyrus' 'Flowers' IP Feud Should Advance, Court Told

Thursday, March 26, 2026iiplaeditorialSource: IIPLA
miley-cyrus-flowers-ip-feud-should-advan.png
Source attribution
Image: Image courtesy of iipla.org

Miley Cyrus' 'Flowers' IP Feud Should Advance, Court Told

By Editorial Team

An entity that owns shares of the copyright to the Bruno Mars song "When I Was Your Man" has asked a California federal judge to let it proceed with its suit claiming the Miley Cyrus song "Flowers" was a rip-off, saying many listeners have observed similarities between the two songs.

The case involves a dispute over intellectual property rights between the two songs, with the entity alleging that "Flowers" infringes upon the copyright of "When I Was Your Man."

The entity has filed a motion requesting the court to advance the case, seeking a resolution to the alleged copyright infringement. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Law firms Davis Wright Tremaine and Willkie Farr are representing the entity in this legal battle over intellectual property rights.

The court will now consider the motion and determine the next steps in the litigation process, which could include discovery, hearings, and ultimately a trial to decide the outcome of the dispute.

This case highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property rights in the music industry and the legal complexities that can arise when similarities are found between songs.

Related Coverage

Continue in the newsroom

Back to newsroom
IP News

Purple Rain Co-Star Ends Apollonia Trademark Rights Suit

‘Purple Rain’ Co-Star Ends ‘Apollonia’ Trademark Rights Suit By Editorial Team Patty Apollonia Kotero, known for her role as Prince’s co-star in the iconic 1984 film “Purple Rain,” has decided to drop her lawsuit agai...

Thursday, April 9, 2026
IP News

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct

Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct By Editorial Team A Houston-based patent attorney faced a tough Federal Circuit bench while seeking to wipe out a $207,000 sanction against him and his clie...

Thursday, April 9, 2026
IP News

J&J Defends Blood-Clotting Powder IP From Baxter Attack

J&J Defends Blood-Clotting Powder IP From Baxter Attack By Editorial Team A subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson has successfully defended its patent for a hemostatic powder used to treat bleeding against objections from B...

Thursday, April 9, 2026