
Electronics company Vicor's defense regarding its alleged lack of "willful blindness" towards SynQor's power converter technology patent faced skepticism from a panel of Federal Circuit judges. The judges highlighted statements made by Vicor's CEO, indicating that he did not review the patent in question.
The case involves claims of patent infringement by Vicor against SynQor. Despite Vicor's arguments that it could not have been aware of SynQor's patent due to lack of examination, the judges expressed doubts about the validity of this defense.
The panel of judges emphasized that Vicor's CEO's admission of not reviewing the patent contradicted the company's assertion of non-willful blindness. This contradiction raised concerns about Vicor's defense strategy in the case.
Legal experts suggest that the skepticism shown by the Federal Circuit judges could potentially impact the outcome of the case. The judges' focus on the CEO's statements may indicate a critical evaluation of Vicor's position in the patent dispute with SynQor.
For more detailed information on the case and related legal documents, subscribers can access the attached briefs from Vicor and SynQor. The case information includes the involved law firms, companies, and government agencies, providing a comprehensive overview of the ongoing legal proceedings.
Share This Article
Ready-to-post copy includes the article link.
Vicor's Patent Defense Faces Skepticism In SynQor Case
Electronics company Vicor's defense regarding its alleged lack of "willful blindness" towards SynQor's power converter technology patent faced skepticism from a panel of Federal Circuit judges. The judges highlighted...
Read the full IIPLA article: https://iipla.org/news/vicors-patent-defense-faces-skepticism-in-synqor-case